Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 453040 | TX | 85 beds | Current EBITDA $5.5M → Pro Forma $7.6M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$597K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$779K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$771K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$474K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$779K$779K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$750K$21K$771K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$119K$354K$474K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$195K$389K$584K$779K$779K$779K$779K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$193K$385K$578K$771K$771K$771K$771K
A/R Days Reduction$0$158K$316K$474K$474K$474K$474K$474K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$558K$1.1M$1.7M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.5M$5.5M14.2%
Year 1$5.7M+$1.4M$7.1M18.1%
Year 2$5.9M+$2.0M$7.9M20.3%
Year 3$6.0M+$2.0M$8.1M20.8%
Year 4$6.2M+$2.0M$8.3M21.3%
Year 5$6.4M+$2.0M$8.5M21.7%
$55.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$93.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.8M
Value Created
$8.5M
Exit EBITDA
$8.8M
Organic Growth
$20.5M
RCM Value Creation
$8.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$389K$584K$779K$934K
Denial Rate Reductio$385K$578K$771K$925K
A/R Days Reduction$237K$355K$474K$569K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 198 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.2%-11.0%2.2%11.6%
P80
Net-to-Gross73.9%16.9%27.7%41.5%
P95
Occupancy75.6%43.9%58.6%75.7%
P74
Rev/Bed$458K$285K$556K$1.2M
P41
Exp/Bed$393K$296K$495K$1.1M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML