Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 12:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 453029 | TX | 74 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $3.0M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$924K
Risk-Adjusted
-$480K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$534K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$528K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$325K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$534K$534K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$514K$15K$528K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$82K$243K$325K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$133K$267K$400K$534K$534K$534K$534K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$132K$264K$396K$528K$528K$528K$528K
A/R Days Reduction$0$108K$216K$325K$325K$325K$325K$325K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$382K$764K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.9x74% / 15.7x75% / 16.6x
9.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
10.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
11.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.8x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
12.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.8x57% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M6.0%
Year 1$1.7M+$936K$2.6M9.7%
Year 2$1.7M+$1.4M$3.1M11.7%
Year 3$1.8M+$1.4M$3.2M11.9%
Year 4$1.8M+$1.4M$3.2M12.1%
Year 5$1.9M+$1.4M$3.3M12.3%
$16.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$36.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$19.9M
Value Created
$3.3M
Exit EBITDA
$2.6M
Organic Growth
$14.0M
RCM Value Creation
$3.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$267K$400K$534K$640K
Denial Rate Reductio$264K$396K$528K$634K
A/R Days Reduction$162K$243K$325K$390K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$17K$20K
Total$702K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 220 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.0%-12.9%1.4%11.4%
P62
Net-to-Gross76.1%17.5%30.0%45.8%
P96
Occupancy54.9%37.6%57.1%75.3%
P46
Rev/Bed$361K$296K$545K$1.1M
P32
Exp/Bed$339K$309K$492K$1.1M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML