Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EL PASO LTAC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EL PASO LTAC HOSPITAL
CCN 452122 | TX | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $983K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$479K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$983K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$479K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$344K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$479K
Modeled Uplift
$302K
Risk-Adjusted
-$176K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$181K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$179K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$109K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$479K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$172K$8K$181K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$179K$179K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$27K$82K$109K$344K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$45K$90K$136K$181K$181K$181K$181K
Cost to Collect$0$45K$90K$134K$179K$179K$179K$179K
A/R Days Reduction$0$36K$73K$109K$109K$109K$109K$109K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$131K$262K$389K$479K$479K$479K$479K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $479K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$983K$983K11.0%
Year 1$1.0M+$319K$1.3M14.9%
Year 2$1.0M+$479K$1.5M17.0%
Year 3$1.1M+$479K$1.6M17.3%
Year 4$1.1M+$479K$1.6M17.7%
Year 5$1.1M+$479K$1.6M18.1%
$9.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.0M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$1.6M
Organic Growth
$4.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$90K$136K$181K$217K
Cost to Collect$90K$134K$179K$215K
A/R Days Reduction$55K$82K$109K$131K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$239K$359K$479K$574K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 271 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.0%-26.8%-3.9%10.5%
P76
Net-to-Gross31.0%24.6%35.6%51.9%
P42
Occupancy37.6%17.5%37.6%66.0%
P50
Rev/Bed$272K$412K$605K$1.2M
P13
Exp/Bed$242K$416K$722K$1.4M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML