Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOUSTON METHODIST ST. CATHERINE LTAC 2026-04-26 17:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOUSTON METHODIST ST. CATHERINE LTAC
CCN 452118 | TX | 145 beds | Current EBITDA $-50.4M → Pro Forma $-47.7M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$51.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-50.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-47.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$878K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$630K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$997K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$159K$471K$630K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$259K$518K$777K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$256K$513K$769K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$210K$420K$630K$630K$630K$630K$630K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$742K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-50.4M$-50.4M-97.3%
Year 1$-51.9M+$1.8M$-50.1M-96.7%
Year 2$-53.5M+$2.7M$-50.7M-97.9%
Year 3$-55.1M+$2.7M$-52.3M-101.0%
Year 4$-56.7M+$2.7M$-54.0M-104.2%
Year 5$-58.4M+$2.7M$-55.7M-107.5%
$-504.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-612.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-108.7M
Value Created
$-55.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-80.3M
Organic Growth
$27.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-55.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$518K$777K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$513K$769K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$315K$473K$630K$756K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$25K$33K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 166 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-8.5%2.5%13.3%
P0
Net-to-Gross16.5%14.8%22.6%32.3%
P32
Occupancy60.2%47.2%62.5%74.7%
P46
Rev/Bed$357K$341K$929K$1.4M
P26
Exp/Bed$705K$382K$888K$1.3M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML