Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CONTINUING CARE 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE CONTINUING CARE
CCN 452105 | TX | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.9M → Pro Forma $-8.2M (+$741K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$741K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-8.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$539K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$741K
Modeled Uplift
$542K
Risk-Adjusted
-$199K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$281K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$279K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$171K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$741K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$281K$281K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$271K$8K$279K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$128K$171K$539K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$70K$141K$211K$281K$281K$281K$281K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$70K$139K$209K$279K$279K$279K$279K
A/R Days Reduction$0$57K$114K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$202K$404K$601K$741K$741K$741K$741K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $741K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.9M$-8.9M-63.4%
Year 1$-9.2M+$494K$-8.7M-61.7%
Year 2$-9.4M+$741K$-8.7M-61.9%
Year 3$-9.7M+$741K$-9.0M-64.0%
Year 4$-10.0M+$741K$-9.3M-66.0%
Year 5$-10.3M+$741K$-9.6M-68.2%
$-89.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-105.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-16.4M
Value Created
$-9.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-14.2M
Organic Growth
$7.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-9.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$141K$211K$281K$337K
Denial Rate Reductio$139K$209K$279K$335K
A/R Days Reduction$86K$128K$171K$205K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$370K$555K$741K$889K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 257 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-36.7%-7.9%9.6%
P0
Net-to-Gross25.8%25.0%36.3%53.9%
P26
Occupancy81.0%13.2%30.0%56.2%
P91
Rev/Bed$562K$436K$654K$1.3M
P41
Exp/Bed$918K$458K$834K$1.4M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML