Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOLARA SPECIALTY HARLINGEN 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOLARA SPECIALTY HARLINGEN
CCN 452101 | TX | 82 beds | Current EBITDA $3.9M → Pro Forma $6.3M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$45.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$631K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$912K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$903K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$555K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$912K$912K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$878K$25K$903K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$140K$415K$555K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT43.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$228K$456K$684K$912K$912K$912K$912K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$226K$451K$677K$903K$903K$903K$903K
A/R Days Reduction$0$185K$370K$555K$555K$555K$555K$555K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$653K$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.3x69% / 14.0x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
10.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x
11.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.9M$3.9M8.7%
Year 1$4.1M+$1.6M$5.7M12.4%
Year 2$4.2M+$2.4M$6.6M14.4%
Year 3$4.3M+$2.4M$6.7M14.7%
Year 4$4.4M+$2.4M$6.8M15.0%
Year 5$4.6M+$2.4M$7.0M15.3%
$39.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$76.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.3M
Value Created
$7.0M
Exit EBITDA
$6.3M
Organic Growth
$24.0M
RCM Value Creation
$7.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$456K$684K$912K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$451K$677K$903K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$277K$416K$555K$666K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$29K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 208 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.7%-11.2%2.0%11.7%
P68
Net-to-Gross13.8%16.8%28.0%43.2%
P16
Occupancy83.6%42.7%57.9%74.2%
P86
Rev/Bed$556K$286K$554K$1.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$508K$302K$492K$1.1M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML