Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TYLER CONTINUECARE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TYLER CONTINUECARE HOSPITAL
CCN 452091 | TX | 51 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.6M → Pro Forma $-580K (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-580K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$768K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$744K
Risk-Adjusted
-$309K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$400K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$396K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$244K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$400K$400K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$385K$11K$396K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$61K$182K$244K$768K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$100K$200K$300K$400K$400K$400K$400K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$99K$198K$297K$396K$396K$396K$396K
A/R Days Reduction$0$81K$162K$244K$244K$244K$244K$244K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$287K$574K$854K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.6M$-1.6M-8.2%
Year 1$-1.7M+$702K$-980K-4.9%
Year 2$-1.7M+$1.1M$-680K-3.4%
Year 3$-1.8M+$1.1M$-732K-3.7%
Year 4$-1.8M+$1.1M$-785K-3.9%
Year 5$-1.9M+$1.1M$-840K-4.2%
$-16.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-9.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.1M
Value Created
$-840K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.6M
Organic Growth
$10.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-840K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$200K$300K$400K$480K
Denial Rate Reductio$198K$297K$396K$476K
A/R Days Reduction$122K$183K$244K$292K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$527K$790K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 231 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.2%-14.4%-0.2%12.5%
P35
Net-to-Gross21.6%21.9%31.6%51.0%
P24
Occupancy65.2%31.0%56.1%75.3%
P63
Rev/Bed$393K$327K$529K$961K
P31
Exp/Bed$425K$339K$495K$1.1M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML