Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - LONGVIEW INC. 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - LONGVIEW INC.
CCN 452087 | TX | 32 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $-468K (+$780K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$780K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-468K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$568K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$780K
Modeled Uplift
$562K
Risk-Adjusted
-$217K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$296K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$293K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$180K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$780K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$296K$296K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$285K$8K$293K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$135K$180K$568K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$74K$148K$222K$296K$296K$296K$296K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$73K$147K$220K$293K$293K$293K$293K
A/R Days Reduction$0$60K$120K$180K$180K$180K$180K$180K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$212K$425K$632K$780K$780K$780K$780K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $780K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-8.4%
Year 1$-1.3M+$520K$-765K-5.2%
Year 2$-1.3M+$780K$-543K-3.7%
Year 3$-1.4M+$780K$-583K-3.9%
Year 4$-1.4M+$780K$-624K-4.2%
Year 5$-1.4M+$780K$-666K-4.5%
$-12.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-7.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.1M
Value Created
$-666K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.0M
Organic Growth
$7.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-666K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$148K$222K$296K$356K
Denial Rate Reductio$147K$220K$293K$352K
A/R Days Reduction$90K$135K$180K$216K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$390K$585K$780K$936K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 274 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.4%-28.4%-3.9%10.3%
P44
Net-to-Gross13.4%24.4%35.3%51.8%
P6
Occupancy70.7%16.4%36.0%64.5%
P79
Rev/Bed$463K$415K$617K$1.2M
P30
Exp/Bed$502K$425K$751K$1.4M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML