Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SQUARED AT CORPUS CHRISTI 2026-04-26 13:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SQUARED AT CORPUS CHRISTI
CCN 452086 | TX | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $5.5M → Pro Forma $6.8M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$977K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$339K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$509K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$504K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$310K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$509K$509K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$490K$14K$504K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$78K$232K$310K$977K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$127K$255K$382K$509K$509K$509K$509K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$126K$252K$378K$504K$504K$504K$504K
A/R Days Reduction$0$103K$207K$310K$310K$310K$310K$310K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$365K$730K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.5M$5.5M21.4%
Year 1$5.6M+$893K$6.5M25.6%
Year 2$5.8M+$1.3M$7.1M28.0%
Year 3$6.0M+$1.3M$7.3M28.7%
Year 4$6.1M+$1.3M$7.5M29.4%
Year 5$6.3M+$1.3M$7.7M30.1%
$54.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$84.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.8M
Value Created
$7.7M
Exit EBITDA
$8.7M
Organic Growth
$13.4M
RCM Value Creation
$7.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$255K$382K$509K$611K
Denial Rate Reductio$252K$378K$504K$605K
A/R Days Reduction$155K$232K$310K$372K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$20K
Total$670K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 279 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.4%-22.8%-2.6%10.5%
P90
Net-to-Gross34.5%24.4%34.4%50.3%
P50
Occupancy86.2%20.0%44.7%70.5%
P91
Rev/Bed$621K$381K$584K$1.2M
P55
Exp/Bed$488K$402K$622K$1.3M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML