Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL EL PASO 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL EL PASO
CCN 452079 | TX | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $426K → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$426K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$863K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$767K
Risk-Adjusted
-$416K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$450K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$445K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$274K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$450K$450K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$433K$12K$445K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$69K$205K$274K$863K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$112K$225K$337K$450K$450K$450K$450K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$111K$223K$334K$445K$445K$445K$445K
A/R Days Reduction$0$91K$182K$274K$274K$274K$274K$274K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$322K$644K$959K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x91% / 25.6x96% / 28.8x100% / 31.9x102% / 33.5x104% / 35.1x
9.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.2x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.5x99% / 30.9x
10.0x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.4x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.2x94% / 27.5x
11.0x78% / 17.7x82% / 20.0x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.5x90% / 24.7x
12.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 18.1x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$426K$426K1.9%
Year 1$439K+$789K$1.2M5.5%
Year 2$452K+$1.2M$1.6M7.3%
Year 3$465K+$1.2M$1.6M7.3%
Year 4$479K+$1.2M$1.7M7.4%
Year 5$494K+$1.2M$1.7M7.5%
$4.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.2M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$678K
Organic Growth
$11.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$225K$337K$450K$540K
Denial Rate Reductio$223K$334K$445K$534K
A/R Days Reduction$137K$205K$274K$328K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$592K$887K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 220 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-14.2%1.0%11.0%
P53
Net-to-Gross18.6%18.8%30.4%48.2%
P24
Occupancy44.7%36.6%57.1%75.3%
P32
Rev/Bed$312K$296K$544K$1.1M
P26
Exp/Bed$306K$309K$486K$1.1M
P24

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML