Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WARM SPRINGS SPECIALITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 21:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WARM SPRINGS SPECIALITY HOSPITAL
CCN 452062 | TX | 29 beds | Current EBITDA $4.2M → Pro Forma $5.5M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$932K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$959K
Risk-Adjusted
-$319K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$486K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$481K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$296K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$486K$486K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$468K$13K$481K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$75K$221K$296K$932K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$121K$243K$364K$486K$486K$486K$486K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$120K$241K$361K$481K$481K$481K$481K
A/R Days Reduction$0$99K$197K$296K$296K$296K$296K$296K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$348K$696K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.2M$4.2M17.2%
Year 1$4.3M+$852K$5.2M21.2%
Year 2$4.4M+$1.3M$5.7M23.5%
Year 3$4.6M+$1.3M$5.8M24.0%
Year 4$4.7M+$1.3M$6.0M24.6%
Year 5$4.8M+$1.3M$6.1M25.2%
$41.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$67.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.5M
Value Created
$6.1M
Exit EBITDA
$6.6M
Organic Growth
$12.8M
RCM Value Creation
$6.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$243K$364K$486K$583K
Denial Rate Reductio$241K$361K$481K$577K
A/R Days Reduction$148K$222K$296K$355K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$639K$959K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 262 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.2%-33.7%-4.7%10.3%
P85
Net-to-Gross35.4%24.2%34.4%50.0%
P51
Occupancy84.0%14.9%32.0%57.4%
P92
Rev/Bed$838K$427K$654K$1.3M
P59
Exp/Bed$694K$446K$815K$1.4M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML