Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SQUARED AT TEXARKANA 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SQUARED AT TEXARKANA
CCN 452061 | TX | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $2.9M (+$779K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$779K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$568K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$779K
Modeled Uplift
$575K
Risk-Adjusted
-$204K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$296K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$293K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$180K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$779K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$296K$296K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$285K$8K$293K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$135K$180K$568K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$74K$148K$222K$296K$296K$296K$296K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$73K$147K$220K$293K$293K$293K$293K
A/R Days Reduction$0$60K$120K$180K$180K$180K$180K$180K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$212K$424K$632K$779K$779K$779K$779K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $779K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M14.0%
Year 1$2.1M+$520K$2.7M17.9%
Year 2$2.2M+$779K$3.0M20.1%
Year 3$2.3M+$779K$3.0M20.6%
Year 4$2.3M+$779K$3.1M21.0%
Year 5$2.4M+$779K$3.2M21.5%
$20.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$35.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.3M
Value Created
$3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$3.3M
Organic Growth
$7.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$148K$222K$296K$355K
Denial Rate Reductio$147K$220K$293K$352K
A/R Days Reduction$90K$135K$180K$216K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$390K$584K$779K$935K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 278 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.0%-30.6%-4.0%10.0%
P82
Net-to-Gross29.4%24.4%35.3%51.9%
P39
Occupancy71.4%15.4%33.8%60.4%
P81
Rev/Bed$494K$421K$624K$1.2M
P36
Exp/Bed$425K$437K$790K$1.4M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML