Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPC HOSP OF SAN ANTONIO MED CTR 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPC HOSP OF SAN ANTONIO MED CTR
CCN 452059 | TX | 62 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$31.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$455K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$630K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$624K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$383K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$630K$630K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$606K$17K$624K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$97K$287K$383K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$158K$315K$473K$630K$630K$630K$630K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$156K$312K$468K$624K$624K$624K$624K
A/R Days Reduction$0$128K$256K$383K$383K$383K$383K$383K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$451K$903K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 18.1x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.3x
9.0x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x81% / 19.5x
10.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x
11.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.3x
12.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 11.0x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.1x
Headroom (turns)
47%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 47% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.4x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M3.6%
Year 1$1.2M+$1.1M$2.3M7.2%
Year 2$1.2M+$1.7M$2.9M9.1%
Year 3$1.2M+$1.7M$2.9M9.2%
Year 4$1.3M+$1.7M$2.9M9.3%
Year 5$1.3M+$1.7M$3.0M9.4%
$11.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$32.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.3M
Value Created
$3.0M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$16.6M
RCM Value Creation
$3.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$315K$473K$630K$756K
Denial Rate Reductio$312K$468K$624K$748K
A/R Days Reduction$192K$287K$383K$460K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$829K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 231 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.6%-14.4%-0.2%10.9%
P59
Net-to-Gross16.3%19.4%30.5%48.8%
P17
Occupancy75.2%34.0%56.2%74.0%
P75
Rev/Bed$508K$306K$544K$1.1M
P48
Exp/Bed$490K$327K$494K$1.1M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML