Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARRUS SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 13:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARRUS SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 452041 | TX | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $-651K → Pro Forma $182K (+$833K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-651K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$833K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$182K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$607K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$833K
Modeled Uplift
$622K
Risk-Adjusted
-$211K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$317K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$313K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$193K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$833K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$317K$317K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$305K$9K$313K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$49K$144K$193K$607K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$79K$158K$237K$317K$317K$317K$317K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$78K$157K$235K$313K$313K$313K$313K
A/R Days Reduction$0$64K$128K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$227K$454K$675K$833K$833K$833K$833K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $833K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-30.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
36.9x
Headroom (turns)
567%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 567% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -30.4x, adding 129.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-651K$-651K-4.1%
Year 1$-671K+$555K$-116K-0.7%
Year 2$-691K+$833K$142K0.9%
Year 3$-712K+$833K$121K0.8%
Year 4$-733K+$833K$100K0.6%
Year 5$-755K+$833K$78K0.5%
$-6.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$856K
Exit EV (11x)
$7.4M
Value Created
$78K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.0M
Organic Growth
$8.3M
RCM Value Creation
$78K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$158K$237K$317K$380K
Denial Rate Reductio$157K$235K$313K$376K
A/R Days Reduction$96K$145K$193K$231K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$416K$625K$833K$1000K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 271 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.1%-26.8%-3.9%10.5%
P49
Net-to-Gross24.7%24.6%35.6%51.9%
P26
Occupancy80.5%17.5%37.6%66.0%
P87
Rev/Bed$480K$412K$605K$1.2M
P33
Exp/Bed$500K$416K$722K$1.4M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML