Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL HOUSTON NORTHWEST 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL HOUSTON NORTHWEST
CCN 452039 | TX | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.1M → Pro Forma $-205K (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-205K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$628K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$738K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$731K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$449K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$738K$738K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$711K$20K$731K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$113K$336K$449K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$185K$369K$554K$738K$738K$738K$738K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$183K$366K$548K$731K$731K$731K$731K
A/R Days Reduction$0$150K$300K$449K$449K$449K$449K$449K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$529K$1.1M$1.6M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.1M$-2.1M-5.8%
Year 1$-2.2M+$1.3M$-916K-2.5%
Year 2$-2.3M+$1.9M$-335K-0.9%
Year 3$-2.3M+$1.9M$-404K-1.1%
Year 4$-2.4M+$1.9M$-474K-1.3%
Year 5$-2.5M+$1.9M$-547K-1.5%
$-21.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-6.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.5M
Value Created
$-547K
Exit EBITDA
$-3.4M
Organic Growth
$19.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-547K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$369K$554K$738K$886K
Denial Rate Reductio$366K$548K$731K$877K
A/R Days Reduction$225K$337K$449K$539K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$28K
Total$971K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 205 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.8%-11.5%2.0%11.7%
P35
Net-to-Gross13.6%16.8%27.8%40.9%
P14
Occupancy55.7%43.3%58.1%75.2%
P45
Rev/Bed$440K$284K$555K$1.2M
P39
Exp/Bed$465K$297K$495K$1.1M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML