Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS NEURO REHAB CENTER 2026-04-26 21:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS NEURO REHAB CENTER
CCN 452038 | TX | 47 beds | Current EBITDA $4.5M → Pro Forma $6.5M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$525K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$768K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$761K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$467K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$768K$768K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$739K$21K$761K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$118K$350K$467K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$192K$384K$576K$768K$768K$768K$768K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$190K$380K$570K$761K$761K$761K$761K
A/R Days Reduction$0$156K$312K$467K$467K$467K$467K$467K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$550K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.5M$4.5M11.6%
Year 1$4.6M+$1.3M$6.0M15.5%
Year 2$4.7M+$2.0M$6.8M17.6%
Year 3$4.9M+$2.0M$6.9M18.0%
Year 4$5.0M+$2.0M$7.1M18.4%
Year 5$5.2M+$2.0M$7.2M18.7%
$44.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$79.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$34.5M
Value Created
$7.2M
Exit EBITDA
$7.1M
Organic Growth
$20.2M
RCM Value Creation
$7.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$384K$576K$768K$922K
Denial Rate Reductio$380K$570K$761K$913K
A/R Days Reduction$234K$351K$467K$561K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$25K$29K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 279 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.6%-21.1%-2.9%10.9%
P77
Net-to-Gross33.4%24.0%34.1%51.2%
P49
Occupancy85.6%22.8%49.3%71.9%
P90
Rev/Bed$817K$338K$562K$1.1M
P65
Exp/Bed$722K$377K$538K$1.2M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML