Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - DALLAS INC. 2026-04-26 21:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - DALLAS INC.
CCN 452022 | TX | 58 beds | Current EBITDA $497K → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$497K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$517K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$802K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$794K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$488K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$802K$802K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$772K$22K$794K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$123K$365K$488K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$200K$401K$601K$802K$802K$802K$802K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$198K$397K$595K$794K$794K$794K$794K
A/R Days Reduction$0$163K$325K$488K$488K$488K$488K$488K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$574K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x105% / 36.2x110% / 40.6x114% / 45.0x116% / 47.2x118% / 49.4x
9.0x100% / 31.9x104% / 35.8x109% / 39.7x111% / 41.6x113% / 43.6x
10.0x95% / 28.4x100% / 31.9x104% / 35.4x106% / 37.1x108% / 38.9x
11.0x91% / 25.5x96% / 28.7x100% / 31.9x102% / 33.5x104% / 35.0x
12.0x87% / 23.1x92% / 26.0x96% / 28.9x98% / 30.4x100% / 31.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
75%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 75% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$497K$497K1.2%
Year 1$512K+$1.4M$1.9M4.8%
Year 2$527K+$2.1M$2.6M6.6%
Year 3$543K+$2.1M$2.7M6.6%
Year 4$559K+$2.1M$2.7M6.7%
Year 5$576K+$2.1M$2.7M6.7%
$5.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.6M
Value Created
$2.7M
Exit EBITDA
$792K
Organic Growth
$21.1M
RCM Value Creation
$2.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$401K$601K$802K$962K
Denial Rate Reductio$397K$595K$794K$952K
A/R Days Reduction$244K$366K$488K$585K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 230 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-14.0%0.2%11.7%
P51
Net-to-Gross16.6%19.4%30.8%49.9%
P17
Occupancy90.9%33.8%56.6%73.6%
P97
Rev/Bed$691K$326K$544K$1.0M
P62
Exp/Bed$683K$330K$492K$1.1M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML