Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL SAN ANTONIO 2026-04-26 18:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL SAN ANTONIO
CCN 452016 | TX | 59 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.7M → Pro Forma $-2.8M (+$941K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$941K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$686K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$941K
Modeled Uplift
$617K
Risk-Adjusted
-$325K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$358K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$354K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$218K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$941K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$358K$358K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$344K$10K$354K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$163K$218K$686K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$89K$179K$268K$358K$358K$358K$358K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$177K$266K$354K$354K$354K$354K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$145K$218K$218K$218K$218K$218K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$256K$513K$763K$941K$941K$941K$941K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $941K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.7M$-3.7M-20.7%
Year 1$-3.8M+$627K$-3.2M-17.8%
Year 2$-3.9M+$941K$-3.0M-16.7%
Year 3$-4.1M+$941K$-3.1M-17.4%
Year 4$-4.2M+$941K$-3.2M-18.1%
Year 5$-4.3M+$941K$-3.4M-18.8%
$-37.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-36.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$147K
Value Created
$-3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.9M
Organic Growth
$9.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$179K$268K$358K$429K
Denial Rate Reductio$177K$266K$354K$425K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$163K$218K$261K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$11K$14K
Total$471K$706K$941K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 231 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.7%-14.3%0.1%11.5%
P17
Net-to-Gross18.6%19.5%30.7%49.7%
P23
Occupancy45.6%33.6%56.2%72.4%
P36
Rev/Bed$303K$324K$544K$1.1M
P24
Exp/Bed$366K$327K$494K$1.1M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML