Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE WMC - BRENHAM 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE WMC - BRENHAM
CCN 451397 | TX | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $3.4M → Pro Forma $5.0M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$531K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$595K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$589K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$362K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$595K$595K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$572K$16K$589K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$91K$271K$362K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$149K$297K$446K$595K$595K$595K$595K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$147K$294K$442K$589K$589K$589K$589K
A/R Days Reduction$0$121K$241K$362K$362K$362K$362K$362K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$426K$852K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.4M$3.4M11.5%
Year 1$3.5M+$1.0M$4.6M15.4%
Year 2$3.6M+$1.6M$5.2M17.5%
Year 3$3.8M+$1.6M$5.3M17.9%
Year 4$3.9M+$1.6M$5.4M18.3%
Year 5$4.0M+$1.6M$5.5M18.6%
$34.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$61.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.7M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$5.5M
Organic Growth
$15.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$297K$446K$595K$714K
Denial Rate Reductio$294K$442K$589K$707K
A/R Days Reduction$181K$271K$362K$434K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$782K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 257 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.5%-36.7%-7.9%9.6%
P79
Net-to-Gross21.8%25.0%36.3%53.9%
P16
Occupancy42.4%13.2%30.0%56.2%
P61
Rev/Bed$1.2M$436K$654K$1.3M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.1M$458K$834K$1.4M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML