Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FRIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 02:41 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FRIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 451391 | TX | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.0M → Pro Forma $-4.0M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 451391

FRIO REGIONAL HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$20.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$766K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$696K
Risk-Adjusted
-$355K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$400K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$396K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$243K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$400K$400K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$385K$11K$396K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$61K$182K$243K$766K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$100K$200K$300K$400K$400K$400K$400K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$99K$198K$297K$396K$396K$396K$396K
A/R Days Reduction$0$81K$162K$243K$243K$243K$243K$243K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$286K$573K$852K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.0M$-5.0M-25.1%
Year 1$-5.2M+$701K$-4.5M-22.4%
Year 2$-5.3M+$1.1M$-4.3M-21.4%
Year 3$-5.5M+$1.1M$-4.4M-22.2%
Year 4$-5.7M+$1.1M$-4.6M-23.0%
Year 5$-5.8M+$1.1M$-4.8M-23.9%
$-50.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-52.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-2.3M
Value Created
$-4.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-8.0M
Organic Growth
$10.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$200K$300K$400K$480K
Denial Rate Reductio$198K$297K$396K$475K
A/R Days Reduction$122K$182K$243K$292K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$526K$788K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 235 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-25.1%-38.2%-8.9%9.0%
P34
Net-to-Gross30.4%25.8%37.5%54.1%
P37
Occupancy45.6%12.6%27.7%53.4%
P68
Rev/Bed$908K$438K$654K$1.2M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.1M$463K$875K$1.4M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML