Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HARDEMAN COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HARDEMAN COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 451352 | TX | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.1M → Pro Forma $-2.7M (+$443K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$443K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+536bps
Margin Improvement
$317K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$443K
Modeled Uplift
$255K
Risk-Adjusted
-$188K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$167K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$165K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$101K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$443K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$159K$8K$167K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$165K$165K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$25K$75K$101K$317K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$42K$84K$126K$167K$167K$167K$167K
Cost to Collect$0$41K$83K$124K$165K$165K$165K$165K
A/R Days Reduction$0$34K$67K$101K$101K$101K$101K$101K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$122K$243K$360K$443K$443K$443K$443K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $443K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.1M$-3.1M-37.9%
Year 1$-3.2M+$295K$-2.9M-35.5%
Year 2$-3.3M+$443K$-2.9M-34.9%
Year 3$-3.4M+$443K$-3.0M-36.1%
Year 4$-3.5M+$443K$-3.1M-37.3%
Year 5$-3.6M+$443K$-3.2M-38.6%
$-31.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-35.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.8M
Value Created
$-3.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.0M
Organic Growth
$4.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$84K$126K$167K$201K
Cost to Collect$83K$124K$165K$198K
A/R Days Reduction$50K$75K$101K$121K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$221K$332K$443K$532K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 247 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-37.9%-37.7%-8.4%9.0%
P24
Net-to-Gross77.9%25.1%36.5%53.8%
P93
Occupancy9.6%13.1%29.3%55.0%
P16
Rev/Bed$344K$432K$659K$1.3M
P17
Exp/Bed$475K$459K$877K$1.4M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML