Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LYNN COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LYNN COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 451351 | TX | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $-5.9M → Pro Forma $-5.2M (+$709K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-5.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$709K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$516K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$709K
Modeled Uplift
$432K
Risk-Adjusted
-$278K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$269K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$267K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$164K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$709K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$269K$269K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$259K$8K$267K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$41K$122K$164K$516K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$67K$134K$202K$269K$269K$269K$269K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$67K$134K$200K$267K$267K$267K$267K
A/R Days Reduction$0$55K$109K$164K$164K$164K$164K$164K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$193K$387K$575K$709K$709K$709K$709K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $709K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-5.9M$-5.9M-44.1%
Year 1$-6.1M+$473K$-5.6M-41.9%
Year 2$-6.3M+$709K$-5.6M-41.5%
Year 3$-6.5M+$709K$-5.8M-42.9%
Year 4$-6.7M+$709K$-6.0M-44.4%
Year 5$-6.9M+$709K$-6.2M-45.9%
$-59.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-67.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$-8.5M
Value Created
$-6.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-9.4M
Organic Growth
$7.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$134K$202K$269K$323K
Denial Rate Reductio$134K$200K$267K$320K
A/R Days Reduction$82K$123K$164K$196K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$355K$532K$709K$851K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 247 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-44.1%-37.7%-8.4%9.0%
P20
Net-to-Gross39.6%25.1%36.5%53.8%
P54
Occupancy20.2%13.1%29.3%55.0%
P38
Rev/Bed$560K$432K$659K$1.3M
P40
Exp/Bed$807K$459K$877K$1.4M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML