Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PLAINS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PLAINS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 451350 | TX | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.8M → Pro Forma $-3.3M (+$495K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$495K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$356K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$495K
Modeled Uplift
$293K
Risk-Adjusted
-$203K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$187K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$186K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$113K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$495K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$179K$8K$187K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$186K$186K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$29K$85K$113K$356K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$47K$94K$140K$187K$187K$187K$187K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$93K$139K$186K$186K$186K$186K
A/R Days Reduction$0$38K$75K$113K$113K$113K$113K$113K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$136K$271K$402K$495K$495K$495K$495K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $495K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.8M$-3.8M-41.0%
Year 1$-3.9M+$330K$-3.6M-38.7%
Year 2$-4.0M+$495K$-3.5M-38.2%
Year 3$-4.2M+$495K$-3.7M-39.5%
Year 4$-4.3M+$495K$-3.8M-40.9%
Year 5$-4.4M+$495K$-3.9M-42.2%
$-38.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-43.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-5.0M
Value Created
$-3.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.1M
Organic Growth
$5.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$94K$140K$187K$224K
Cost to Collect$93K$139K$186K$223K
A/R Days Reduction$57K$85K$113K$136K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$248K$372K$495K$595K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 180 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-41.0%-45.4%-15.6%8.9%
P29
Net-to-Gross71.7%25.8%38.0%55.6%
P86
Occupancy13.2%12.3%23.6%46.0%
P28
Rev/Bed$546K$454K$733K$1.4M
P36
Exp/Bed$771K$581K$1.0M$1.7M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML