Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LILLIAN M. HUDSPETH MEMORIAL HOSP. 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LILLIAN M. HUDSPETH MEMORIAL HOSP.
CCN 451324 | TX | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.0M → Pro Forma $-3.5M (+$503K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$503K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+533bps
Margin Improvement
$362K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$503K
Modeled Uplift
$305K
Risk-Adjusted
-$198K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$190K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$189K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$115K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$503K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$182K$8K$190K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$189K$189K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$29K$86K$115K$362K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$47K$95K$142K$190K$190K$190K$190K
Cost to Collect$0$47K$94K$141K$189K$189K$189K$189K
A/R Days Reduction$0$38K$77K$115K$115K$115K$115K$115K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$138K$275K$408K$503K$503K$503K$503K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $503K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.0M$-4.0M-42.3%
Year 1$-4.1M+$335K$-3.8M-40.1%
Year 2$-4.2M+$503K$-3.7M-39.6%
Year 3$-4.4M+$503K$-3.9M-40.9%
Year 4$-4.5M+$503K$-4.0M-42.3%
Year 5$-4.6M+$503K$-4.1M-43.8%
$-39.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-45.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$-5.5M
Value Created
$-4.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.4M
Organic Growth
$5.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$95K$142K$190K$228K
Cost to Collect$94K$141K$189K$226K
A/R Days Reduction$57K$86K$115K$138K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$251K$377K$503K$603K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-42.3%-49.5%-29.7%6.5%
P34
Net-to-Gross56.5%22.8%43.4%64.7%
P62
Occupancy13.9%10.8%18.7%29.7%
P40
Rev/Bed$943K$482K$821K$1.8M
P55
Exp/Bed$1.3M$695K$1.1M$2.0M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML