Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS MFH - JACKSONVILLE 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS MFH - JACKSONVILLE
CCN 451319 | TX | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $7.3M → Pro Forma $11.6M (+$4.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 451319

CHRISTUS MFH - JACKSONVILLE
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$81.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$4.3M
Modeled Uplift
$3.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.0M (vs $4.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$995K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$52K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$251K$744K$995K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$52K$52K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$409K$818K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$405K$810K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$332K$664K$995K$995K$995K$995K$995K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K$52K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
9.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
11.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
12.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.3M$7.3M8.9%
Year 1$7.5M+$2.9M$10.3M12.6%
Year 2$7.7M+$4.3M$12.0M14.7%
Year 3$7.9M+$4.3M$12.2M15.0%
Year 4$8.2M+$4.3M$12.5M15.2%
Year 5$8.4M+$4.3M$12.7M15.5%
$72.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$139.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$67.3M
Value Created
$12.7M
Exit EBITDA
$11.6M
Organic Growth
$43.0M
RCM Value Creation
$12.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$818K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$810K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$498K$747K$995K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$52K$63K
Total$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 236 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.9%-37.9%-8.6%8.9%
P74
Net-to-Gross19.1%25.1%36.9%53.9%
P11
Occupancy48.8%12.7%27.9%53.8%
P70
Rev/Bed$3.6M$438K$656K$1.3M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.2M$464K$876K$1.4M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML