Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STONEWALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STONEWALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 451318 | TX | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.8M → Pro Forma $-1.3M (+$468K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$468K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+535bps
Margin Improvement
$336K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$468K
Modeled Uplift
$270K
Risk-Adjusted
-$198K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$177K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$175K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$107K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$468K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$169K$8K$177K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$175K$175K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$27K$80K$107K$336K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$44K$88K$133K$177K$177K$177K$177K
Cost to Collect$0$44K$88K$131K$175K$175K$175K$175K
A/R Days Reduction$0$36K$71K$107K$107K$107K$107K$107K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$128K$257K$380K$468K$468K$468K$468K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $468K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.8M$-1.8M-20.5%
Year 1$-1.8M+$312K$-1.5M-17.5%
Year 2$-1.9M+$468K$-1.4M-16.4%
Year 3$-2.0M+$468K$-1.5M-17.1%
Year 4$-2.0M+$468K$-1.6M-17.7%
Year 5$-2.1M+$468K$-1.6M-18.4%
$-17.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-17.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$209K
Value Created
$-1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-2.9M
Organic Growth
$4.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$88K$133K$177K$212K
Cost to Collect$88K$131K$175K$210K
A/R Days Reduction$53K$80K$107K$128K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$234K$351K$468K$562K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 221 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.5%-41.9%-12.0%8.9%
P41
Net-to-Gross90.1%25.6%37.9%54.2%
P95
Occupancy9.5%12.5%25.4%52.2%
P16
Rev/Bed$438K$439K$670K$1.3M
P25
Exp/Bed$527K$500K$913K$1.4M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML