Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH RUNNELS HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-26 19:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH RUNNELS HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 451315 | TX | 12 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.9M → Pro Forma $-2.5M (+$416K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$416K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+537bps
Margin Improvement
$297K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$416K
Modeled Uplift
$256K
Risk-Adjusted
-$160K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$157K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$155K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$94K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$416K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$149K$8K$157K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$155K$155K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$24K$70K$94K$297K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$39K$79K$118K$157K$157K$157K$157K
Cost to Collect$0$39K$77K$116K$155K$155K$155K$155K
A/R Days Reduction$0$31K$63K$94K$94K$94K$94K$94K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$114K$228K$338K$416K$416K$416K$416K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $416K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.9M$-2.9M-37.2%
Year 1$-3.0M+$277K$-2.7M-34.7%
Year 2$-3.1M+$416K$-2.6M-34.1%
Year 3$-3.1M+$416K$-2.7M-35.3%
Year 4$-3.2M+$416K$-2.8M-36.5%
Year 5$-3.3M+$416K$-2.9M-37.8%
$-28.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-32.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-3.4M
Value Created
$-2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.6M
Organic Growth
$4.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$79K$118K$157K$189K
Cost to Collect$77K$116K$155K$186K
A/R Days Reduction$47K$71K$94K$113K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$208K$312K$416K$499K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 98 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-37.2%-44.5%-16.8%8.9%
P35
Net-to-Gross62.5%24.2%41.5%60.4%
P77
Occupancy19.9%11.0%19.2%42.3%
P52
Rev/Bed$645K$479K$838K$1.8M
P42
Exp/Bed$885K$660K$1.1M$2.0M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML