Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FISHER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FISHER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
CCN 451313 | TX | 13 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.0M → Pro Forma $-2.6M (+$393K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$393K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+539bps
Margin Improvement
$279K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$393K
Modeled Uplift
$228K
Risk-Adjusted
-$164K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$149K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$146K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$89K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+13bp
Total EBITDA Impact$393K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$140K$8K$149K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$146K$146K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$22K$66K$89K$279K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$37K$74K$111K$149K$149K$149K$149K
Cost to Collect$0$36K$73K$109K$146K$146K$146K$146K
A/R Days Reduction$0$30K$59K$89K$89K$89K$89K$89K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$108K$216K$319K$393K$393K$393K$393K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $393K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.0M$-3.0M-41.4%
Year 1$-3.1M+$262K$-2.8M-39.0%
Year 2$-3.2M+$393K$-2.8M-38.5%
Year 3$-3.3M+$393K$-2.9M-39.8%
Year 4$-3.4M+$393K$-3.0M-41.2%
Year 5$-3.5M+$393K$-3.1M-42.6%
$-30.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-34.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$-4.0M
Value Created
$-3.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.8M
Organic Growth
$3.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$74K$111K$149K$178K
Cost to Collect$73K$109K$146K$175K
A/R Days Reduction$44K$67K$89K$106K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$196K$294K$393K$471K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-41.4%-47.7%-20.8%5.8%
P31
Net-to-Gross74.0%25.5%39.1%54.7%
P88
Occupancy11.0%11.9%21.1%40.0%
P23
Rev/Bed$561K$472K$797K$1.4M
P34
Exp/Bed$793K$641K$1.1M$1.7M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML