Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BALLINGER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BALLINGER MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 451310 | TX | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $1.1M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$906K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$906K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$661K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$906K
Modeled Uplift
$565K
Risk-Adjusted
-$341K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$344K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$341K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$210K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$906K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$344K$344K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$332K$9K$341K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$157K$210K$661K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$86K$172K$258K$344K$344K$344K$344K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$85K$171K$256K$341K$341K$341K$341K
A/R Days Reduction$0$70K$140K$210K$210K$210K$210K$210K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$247K$493K$735K$906K$906K$906K$906K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $906K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x
9.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
10.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
11.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
12.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
28%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 28% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.1M$1.1M6.5%
Year 1$1.2M+$604K$1.8M10.2%
Year 2$1.2M+$906K$2.1M12.2%
Year 3$1.2M+$906K$2.1M12.4%
Year 4$1.3M+$906K$2.2M12.6%
Year 5$1.3M+$906K$2.2M12.8%
$11.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.1M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.8M
Organic Growth
$9.1M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$172K$258K$344K$413K
Denial Rate Reductio$171K$256K$341K$409K
A/R Days Reduction$105K$157K$210K$251K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$453K$680K$906K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.5%-46.0%-16.8%8.7%
P72
Net-to-Gross50.7%25.8%39.5%56.2%
P70
Occupancy23.8%12.3%23.2%45.6%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.1M$454K$733K$1.4M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.0M$588K$1.0M$1.6M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML