Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KIMBLE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KIMBLE HOSPITAL
CCN 451306 | TX | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-622K → Pro Forma $-196K (+$426K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-622K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$426K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-196K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+537bps
Margin Improvement
$305K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$426K
Modeled Uplift
$253K
Risk-Adjusted
-$173K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$161K
+203bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$159K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$97K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+12bp
Total EBITDA Impact$426K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$153K$8K$161K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$159K$159K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$24K$72K$97K$305K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$40K$81K$121K$161K$161K$161K$161K
Cost to Collect$0$40K$79K$119K$159K$159K$159K$159K
A/R Days Reduction$0$32K$64K$97K$97K$97K$97K$97K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$117K$234K$346K$426K$426K$426K$426K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $426K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-622K$-622K-7.8%
Year 1$-641K+$284K$-357K-4.5%
Year 2$-660K+$426K$-234K-2.9%
Year 3$-680K+$426K$-254K-3.2%
Year 4$-700K+$426K$-274K-3.4%
Year 5$-721K+$426K$-295K-3.7%
$-6.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.0M
Value Created
$-295K
Exit EBITDA
$-991K
Organic Growth
$4.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-295K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$81K$121K$161K$193K
Cost to Collect$79K$119K$159K$191K
A/R Days Reduction$48K$73K$97K$116K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$213K$320K$426K$512K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 164 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.8%-46.0%-18.7%8.0%
P58
Net-to-Gross67.9%26.0%39.5%56.2%
P83
Occupancy9.6%12.2%22.2%44.0%
P17
Rev/Bed$530K$456K$764K$1.4M
P33
Exp/Bed$571K$595K$1.0M$1.7M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML