Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BURLESON ST. JOSEPH HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BURLESON ST. JOSEPH HEALTH CENTER
CCN 451305 | TX | 15 beds | Current EBITDA $-502K → Pro Forma $166K (+$668K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-502K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$668K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$166K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$485K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$668K
Modeled Uplift
$442K
Risk-Adjusted
-$226K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$253K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$252K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$154K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$668K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$253K$253K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$243K$8K$252K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$115K$154K$485K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$63K$126K$190K$253K$253K$253K$253K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$63K$126K$189K$252K$252K$252K$252K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$103K$154K$154K$154K$154K$154K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$182K$365K$542K$668K$668K$668K$668K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $668K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-25.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
32.1x
Headroom (turns)
494%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 494% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -25.6x, adding 124.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-502K$-502K-4.0%
Year 1$-517K+$445K$-72K-0.6%
Year 2$-533K+$668K$135K1.1%
Year 3$-549K+$668K$119K0.9%
Year 4$-565K+$668K$103K0.8%
Year 5$-582K+$668K$86K0.7%
$-5.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$946K
Exit EV (11x)
$6.0M
Value Created
$86K
Exit EBITDA
$-800K
Organic Growth
$6.7M
RCM Value Creation
$86K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$126K$190K$253K$304K
Denial Rate Reductio$126K$189K$252K$302K
A/R Days Reduction$77K$115K$154K$185K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$334K$501K$668K$802K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 164 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.0%-46.0%-18.7%8.0%
P59
Net-to-Gross24.0%26.0%39.5%56.2%
P20
Occupancy42.8%12.2%22.2%44.0%
P74
Rev/Bed$843K$456K$764K$1.4M
P55
Exp/Bed$877K$595K$1.0M$1.7M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML