Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHLAKE SPECIALITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHLAKE SPECIALITY HOSPITAL
CCN 450888 | TX | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $9.3M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$65.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$796K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$42K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$36K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$201K$596K$796K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$42K$42K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT55.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$327K$654K$982K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$324K$648K$972K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$265K$531K$796K$796K$796K$796K$796K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cumulative$0$938K$1.9M$2.8M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.6x61% / 11.0x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
9.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
10.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
11.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
12.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M8.9%
Year 1$6.0M+$2.3M$8.3M12.7%
Year 2$6.2M+$3.4M$9.6M14.7%
Year 3$6.4M+$3.4M$9.8M15.0%
Year 4$6.5M+$3.4M$10.0M15.3%
Year 5$6.7M+$3.4M$10.2M15.6%
$58.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$112.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$53.9M
Value Created
$10.2M
Exit EBITDA
$9.3M
Organic Growth
$34.4M
RCM Value Creation
$10.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$654K$982K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$648K$972K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$398K$597K$796K$956K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$31K$42K$50K
Total$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 180 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.9%-45.4%-15.6%8.9%
P75
Net-to-Gross35.6%25.8%38.0%55.6%
P44
Occupancy7.4%12.3%23.6%46.0%
P9
Rev/Bed$3.8M$454K$733K$1.4M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.5M$581K$1.0M$1.7M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML