Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR MEDICAL CENTER AT TROPHY CLUB 2026-04-26 18:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR MEDICAL CENTER AT TROPHY CLUB
CCN 450883 | TX | 21 beds | Current EBITDA $28.2M → Pro Forma $32.9M (+$4.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$89.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$28.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$32.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.7M
Modeled Uplift
$3.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.0M (vs $4.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$57K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$49K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$275K$816K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$57K$57K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$448K$897K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$444K$888K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$364K$727K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x57% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x26% / 3.2x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$28.2M$28.2M31.5%
Year 1$29.1M+$3.1M$32.2M35.9%
Year 2$29.9M+$4.7M$34.6M38.6%
Year 3$30.8M+$4.7M$35.5M39.6%
Year 4$31.8M+$4.7M$36.5M40.7%
Year 5$32.7M+$4.7M$37.4M41.7%
$282.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$411.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$129.5M
Value Created
$37.4M
Exit EBITDA
$44.9M
Organic Growth
$47.2M
RCM Value Creation
$37.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$897K$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$888K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$546K$818K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$43K$57K$69K
Total$2.4M$3.5M$4.7M$5.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 229 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin31.5%-40.1%-8.9%9.2%
P97
Net-to-Gross41.6%25.6%37.7%54.0%
P56
Occupancy16.5%12.5%26.8%53.0%
P33
Rev/Bed$4.3M$439K$654K$1.3M
P94
Exp/Bed$2.9M$469K$877K$1.4M
P91

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML