Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LUBBOCK HEART HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LUBBOCK HEART HOSPITAL
CCN 450876 | TX | 73 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $8.2M (+$5.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$103.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$5.4M
Modeled Uplift
$3.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.4M (vs $5.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$66K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$57K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$318K$943K$1.3M$4.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$66K$66K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT45.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$518K$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$513K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$420K$840K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$33K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.3x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.4x
9.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.0x
10.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.2x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.3x
11.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x
12.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M2.6%
Year 1$2.8M+$3.6M$6.5M6.2%
Year 2$2.9M+$5.4M$8.4M8.1%
Year 3$3.0M+$5.4M$8.4M8.2%
Year 4$3.1M+$5.4M$8.5M8.2%
Year 5$3.2M+$5.4M$8.6M8.3%
$27.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$94.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$67.5M
Value Created
$8.6M
Exit EBITDA
$4.4M
Organic Growth
$54.5M
RCM Value Creation
$8.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$630K$945K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$33K$50K$66K$80K
Total$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 217 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-13.7%1.5%11.7%
P53
Net-to-Gross24.8%17.8%30.1%45.9%
P37
Occupancy21.9%37.6%57.1%75.6%
P13
Rev/Bed$1.4M$297K$544K$1.1M
P86
Exp/Bed$1.4M$309K$490K$1.1M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML