Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SURGICAL HOSPITAL LAS COLINAS 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR SURGICAL HOSPITAL LAS COLINAS
CCN 450874 | TX | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $26.6M → Pro Forma $30.8M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$79.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$30.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$972K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$245K$727K$972K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$399K$798K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$395K$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$324K$648K$972K$972K$972K$972K$972K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.6M$26.6M33.3%
Year 1$27.4M+$2.8M$30.2M37.8%
Year 2$28.2M+$4.2M$32.4M40.5%
Year 3$29.0M+$4.2M$33.2M41.6%
Year 4$29.9M+$4.2M$34.1M42.7%
Year 5$30.8M+$4.2M$35.0M43.8%
$265.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$384.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$119.3M
Value Created
$35.0M
Exit EBITDA
$42.3M
Organic Growth
$42.0M
RCM Value Creation
$35.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$798K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$791K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$486K$729K$972K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$38K$51K$61K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 221 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.3%-41.9%-12.0%8.9%
P99
Net-to-Gross45.6%25.6%37.9%54.2%
P64
Occupancy17.7%12.5%25.4%52.2%
P36
Rev/Bed$4.0M$439K$670K$1.3M
P93
Exp/Bed$2.7M$500K$913K$1.4M
P88

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML