Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $32.1M (vs $44.6M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $17.0M | $17.0M | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $16.3M | $466K | $16.8M | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $2.6M | $7.7M | $10.3M | $32.5M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $543K | $543K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 25.1% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $4.2M | $8.5M | $12.7M | $17.0M | $17.0M | $17.0M | $17.0M |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $4.2M | $8.4M | $12.6M | $16.8M | $16.8M | $16.8M | $16.8M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $3.4M | $6.9M | $10.3M | $10.3M | $10.3M | $10.3M | $10.3M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $271K | $543K | $543K | $543K | $543K | $543K | $543K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $12.1M | $24.3M | $36.2M | $44.6M | $44.6M | $44.6M | $44.6M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $44.6M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 57% / 9.4x | 61% / 10.8x | 65% / 12.2x | 67% / 12.9x | 69% / 13.6x |
| 9.0x | 52% / 8.0x | 56% / 9.2x | 60% / 10.5x | 62% / 11.1x | 64% / 11.8x |
| 10.0x | 47% / 6.9x | 52% / 8.0x | 56% / 9.1x | 57% / 9.7x | 59% / 10.2x |
| 11.0x | 43% / 6.0x | 47% / 7.0x | 52% / 8.0x | 53% / 8.5x | 55% / 9.0x |
| 12.0x | 39% / 5.2x | 44% / 6.1x | 48% / 7.1x | 50% / 7.5x | 52% / 8.0x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $78.1M | — | $78.1M | 9.2% |
| Year 1 | $80.4M | +$29.7M | $110.2M | 13.0% |
| Year 2 | $82.9M | +$44.6M | $127.5M | 15.0% |
| Year 3 | $85.3M | +$44.6M | $129.9M | 15.3% |
| Year 4 | $87.9M | +$44.6M | $132.5M | 15.6% |
| Year 5 | $90.5M | +$44.6M | $135.1M | 15.9% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $8.5M | $12.7M | $17.0M | $20.3M |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $8.4M | $12.6M | $16.8M | $20.1M |
| A/R Days Reduction | $5.2M | $7.7M | $10.3M | $12.4M |
| Clean Claim Rate | $271K | $407K | $543K | $651K |
| Total | $22.3M | $33.4M | $44.6M | $53.5M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 100 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 9.2% | -9.2% | 3.7% | 14.6% | P61 |
| Net-to-Gross | 24.7% | 12.7% | 18.2% | 25.1% | P72 |
| Occupancy | 80.2% | 61.3% | 69.1% | 78.3% | P78 |
| Rev/Bed | $2.2M | $1.0M | $1.3M | $1.6M | P92 |
| Exp/Bed | $2.0M | $923K | $1.2M | $1.7M | P84 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.