Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN FIRST COLONY 2026-04-26 06:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN FIRST COLONY
CCN 450860 | TX | 6 beds | Current EBITDA $10.9M → Pro Forma $13.5M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$687K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$961K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$952K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$585K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$961K$961K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$925K$26K$952K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$147K$437K$585K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT71.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$240K$481K$721K$961K$961K$961K$961K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$238K$476K$714K$952K$952K$952K$952K
A/R Days Reduction$0$195K$390K$585K$585K$585K$585K$585K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$689K$1.4M$2.1M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.9M$10.9M22.7%
Year 1$11.3M+$1.7M$12.9M26.9%
Year 2$11.6M+$2.5M$14.1M29.4%
Year 3$11.9M+$2.5M$14.5M30.1%
Year 4$12.3M+$2.5M$14.8M30.8%
Year 5$12.7M+$2.5M$15.2M31.6%
$109.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$167.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.9M
Value Created
$15.2M
Exit EBITDA
$17.4M
Organic Growth
$25.3M
RCM Value Creation
$15.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$481K$721K$961K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$476K$714K$952K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$292K$439K$585K$702K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.7%-49.5%-44.0%-24.3%
P100
Net-to-Gross34.1%19.4%31.1%58.0%
P50
Occupancy30.7%12.9%16.3%21.0%
P88
Rev/Bed$8.0M$709K$838K$2.2M
P100
Exp/Bed$6.2M$1.2M$1.4M$2.7M
P100

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML