Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN SUGARLAND 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN SUGARLAND
CCN 450848 | TX | 205 beds | Current EBITDA $33.9M → Pro Forma $49.6M (+$15.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$298.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$33.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$49.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$15.7M
Modeled Uplift
$10.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.6M (vs $15.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$191K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$164K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$915K$2.7M$3.6M$11.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$191K$191K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$95K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.5M$12.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$33.9M$33.9M11.4%
Year 1$35.0M+$10.5M$45.4M15.2%
Year 2$36.0M+$15.7M$51.7M17.3%
Year 3$37.1M+$15.7M$52.8M17.7%
Year 4$38.2M+$15.7M$53.9M18.1%
Year 5$39.3M+$15.7M$55.0M18.4%
$339.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$605.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$266.0M
Value Created
$55.0M
Exit EBITDA
$54.0M
Organic Growth
$156.9M
RCM Value Creation
$55.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$95K$143K$191K$229K
Total$7.8M$11.8M$15.7M$18.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.4%-6.9%4.8%13.3%
P66
Net-to-Gross21.3%13.5%18.9%28.1%
P56
Occupancy56.5%49.4%65.1%75.3%
P36
Rev/Bed$1.5M$608K$1.2M$1.5M
P72
Exp/Bed$1.3M$616K$1.0M$1.4M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML