Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN KATY 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN KATY
CCN 450847 | TX | 196 beds | Current EBITDA $50.6M → Pro Forma $70.7M (+$20.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$381.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$50.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$70.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$20.1M
Modeled Uplift
$14.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.8M (vs $20.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$244K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.6M$7.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.3M$210K$7.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.6M$14.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$244K$244K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$122K$244K$244K$244K$244K$244K$244K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$10.9M$16.3M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$50.6M$50.6M13.3%
Year 1$52.1M+$13.4M$65.5M17.2%
Year 2$53.7M+$20.1M$73.8M19.3%
Year 3$55.3M+$20.1M$75.4M19.8%
Year 4$57.0M+$20.1M$77.0M20.2%
Year 5$58.7M+$20.1M$78.8M20.6%
$506.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$866.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$360.1M
Value Created
$78.8M
Exit EBITDA
$80.6M
Organic Growth
$200.7M
RCM Value Creation
$78.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$122K$183K$244K$293K
Total$10.0M$15.0M$20.1M$24.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 150 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.3%-8.2%4.1%13.6%
P74
Net-to-Gross21.4%13.6%18.9%28.5%
P57
Occupancy80.0%49.6%64.6%74.6%
P85
Rev/Bed$1.9M$605K$1.2M$1.5M
P90
Exp/Bed$1.7M$617K$1.0M$1.5M
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML