Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST WILLOWBROOK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST WILLOWBROOK HOSPITAL
CCN 450844 | TX | 346 beds | Current EBITDA $71.5M → Pro Forma $106.3M (+$34.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$661.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$71.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$106.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$34.8M
Modeled Uplift
$25.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $25.5M (vs $34.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$424K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.2M$13.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.7M$364K$13.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.0M$8.1M$25.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$424K$424K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.8M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$212K$424K$424K$424K$424K$424K$424K
Cumulative$0$9.5M$19.0M$28.2M$34.8M$34.8M$34.8M$34.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x
9.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$71.5M$71.5M10.8%
Year 1$73.6M+$23.2M$96.8M14.6%
Year 2$75.8M+$34.8M$110.7M16.7%
Year 3$78.1M+$34.8M$112.9M17.1%
Year 4$80.5M+$34.8M$115.3M17.4%
Year 5$82.9M+$34.8M$117.7M17.8%
$714.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.29B
Exit EV (11x)
$579.7M
Value Created
$117.7M
Exit EBITDA
$113.9M
Organic Growth
$348.2M
RCM Value Creation
$117.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.6M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.0M$8.1M$9.7M
Clean Claim Rate$212K$318K$424K$508K
Total$17.4M$26.1M$34.8M$41.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.8%-7.9%4.8%14.7%
P63
Net-to-Gross17.3%12.7%18.1%25.0%
P45
Occupancy84.1%57.7%68.4%77.6%
P88
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
P88
Exp/Bed$1.7M$895K$1.2M$1.6M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML