Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS SPOHN ALICE 2026-04-26 15:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS SPOHN ALICE
CCN 450828 | TX | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $8.9M → Pro Forma $12.3M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$65.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$794K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$42K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$36K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$200K$594K$794K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$42K$42K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$326K$652K$979K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$323K$646K$969K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$265K$529K$794K$794K$794K$794K$794K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cumulative$0$935K$1.9M$2.8M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.9M$8.9M13.6%
Year 1$9.2M+$2.3M$11.5M17.6%
Year 2$9.4M+$3.4M$12.9M19.7%
Year 3$9.7M+$3.4M$13.2M20.2%
Year 4$10.0M+$3.4M$13.5M20.6%
Year 5$10.3M+$3.4M$13.8M21.1%
$89.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$151.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$62.3M
Value Created
$13.8M
Exit EBITDA
$14.2M
Organic Growth
$34.3M
RCM Value Creation
$13.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$652K$979K$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$646K$969K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$397K$595K$794K$953K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$31K$42K$50K
Total$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 220 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.6%-14.2%1.0%11.0%
P78
Net-to-Gross13.7%18.8%30.4%48.2%
P12
Occupancy25.9%36.6%57.1%75.3%
P19
Rev/Bed$906K$296K$544K$1.1M
P69
Exp/Bed$783K$309K$486K$1.1M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML