Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY LAS COLINAS 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CITY LAS COLINAS
CCN 450822 | TX | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $25.1M → Pro Forma $31.7M (+$6.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$125.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$25.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$31.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$6.6M
Modeled Uplift
$4.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.7M (vs $6.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$80K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$69K$2.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$384K$1.1M$1.5M$4.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$80K$80K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$626K$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$620K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$508K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$40K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K$80K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$25.1M$25.1M20.0%
Year 1$25.8M+$4.4M$30.2M24.2%
Year 2$26.6M+$6.6M$33.2M26.5%
Year 3$27.4M+$6.6M$34.0M27.2%
Year 4$28.2M+$6.6M$34.8M27.8%
Year 5$29.1M+$6.6M$35.7M28.5%
$250.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$392.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$141.5M
Value Created
$35.7M
Exit EBITDA
$40.0M
Organic Growth
$65.9M
RCM Value Creation
$35.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$762K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$40K$60K$80K$96K
Total$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 205 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.0%-11.5%2.0%11.7%
P88
Net-to-Gross10.9%16.8%27.8%40.9%
P4
Occupancy68.2%43.3%58.1%75.2%
P63
Rev/Bed$1.5M$284K$555K$1.2M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.2M$297K$495K$1.1M
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML