Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PALESTINE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PALESTINE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450747 | TX | 148 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $7.3M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$90.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.1M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$58K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$50K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$278K$826K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$58K$58K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$454K$907K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$449K$898K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$368K$736K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 19.2x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.4x93% / 26.6x
9.0x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.3x
10.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
11.0x67% / 13.1x72% / 14.9x76% / 16.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.5x
12.0x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x76% / 16.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M2.8%
Year 1$2.6M+$3.2M$5.8M6.4%
Year 2$2.7M+$4.8M$7.4M8.2%
Year 3$2.7M+$4.8M$7.5M8.3%
Year 4$2.8M+$4.8M$7.6M8.4%
Year 5$2.9M+$4.8M$7.7M8.5%
$25.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$84.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$59.4M
Value Created
$7.7M
Exit EBITDA
$4.0M
Organic Growth
$47.7M
RCM Value Creation
$7.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$907K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$898K$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$552K$828K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$58K$70K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 170 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-8.5%2.9%13.8%
P49
Net-to-Gross17.2%14.4%22.0%32.2%
P36
Occupancy41.0%47.9%63.2%74.0%
P16
Rev/Bed$613K$347K$938K$1.4M
P39
Exp/Bed$596K$392K$888K$1.3M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML