Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH DENTON 2026-04-26 23:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS HEALTH DENTON
CCN 450743 | TX | 214 beds | Current EBITDA $8.8M → Pro Forma $22.8M (+$14.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 450743

TEXAS HEALTH DENTON
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$267.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$14.1M
Modeled Uplift
$9.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.8M (vs $14.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$171K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.4M$5.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.2M$147K$5.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$821K$2.4M$3.3M$10.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$171K$171K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.4M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 17.0x81% / 19.2x85% / 21.5x87% / 22.6x88% / 23.7x
9.0x71% / 14.7x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.7x82% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x
10.0x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x79% / 18.3x
11.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.1x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x
12.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.3x
Headroom (turns)
50%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 50% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.2x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.8M$8.8M3.3%
Year 1$9.0M+$9.4M$18.4M6.9%
Year 2$9.3M+$14.1M$23.4M8.7%
Year 3$9.6M+$14.1M$23.7M8.8%
Year 4$9.9M+$14.1M$23.9M8.9%
Year 5$10.2M+$14.1M$24.2M9.1%
$87.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$266.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$179.0M
Value Created
$24.2M
Exit EBITDA
$13.9M
Organic Growth
$140.8M
RCM Value Creation
$24.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$128K$171K$206K
Total$7.0M$10.6M$14.1M$16.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.3%-6.7%5.4%13.9%
P45
Net-to-Gross25.6%13.5%18.9%28.1%
P70
Occupancy65.8%50.1%65.6%75.4%
P50
Rev/Bed$1.3M$613K$1.2M$1.5M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.2M$636K$1.0M$1.5M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML