Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROUND ROCK MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROUND ROCK MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450718 | TX | 161 beds | Current EBITDA $76.3M → Pro Forma $92.0M (+$15.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$296.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$76.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$92.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$15.6M
Modeled Uplift
$11.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.9M (vs $15.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$190K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.9M$5.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$163K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$910K$2.7M$3.6M$11.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$190K$190K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$95K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K$190K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.5M$12.7M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$76.3M$76.3M25.7%
Year 1$78.6M+$10.4M$89.0M30.0%
Year 2$81.0M+$15.6M$96.6M32.6%
Year 3$83.4M+$15.6M$99.0M33.4%
Year 4$85.9M+$15.6M$101.5M34.2%
Year 5$88.5M+$15.6M$104.1M35.1%
$763.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.15B
Exit EV (11x)
$381.8M
Value Created
$104.1M
Exit EBITDA
$121.6M
Organic Growth
$156.1M
RCM Value Creation
$104.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$95K$142K$190K$228K
Total$7.8M$11.7M$15.6M$18.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 160 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.7%-9.0%2.6%14.6%
P92
Net-to-Gross12.6%14.0%21.1%30.8%
P18
Occupancy92.1%48.3%63.9%73.9%
P97
Rev/Bed$1.8M$387K$1.0M$1.5M
P91
Exp/Bed$1.4M$437K$965K$1.3M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML