Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH AUSTIN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH AUSTIN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 450713 | TX | 340 beds | Current EBITDA $89.5M → Pro Forma $114.0M (+$24.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$465.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$89.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$114.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$24.5M
Modeled Uplift
$17.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.5M (vs $24.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$298K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.3M$9.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.0M$256K$9.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.7M$17.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$298K$298K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$149K$298K$298K$298K$298K$298K$298K
Cumulative$0$6.7M$13.3M$19.8M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M$24.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$89.5M$89.5M19.2%
Year 1$92.2M+$16.3M$108.5M23.3%
Year 2$94.9M+$24.5M$119.4M25.7%
Year 3$97.8M+$24.5M$122.3M26.3%
Year 4$100.7M+$24.5M$125.2M26.9%
Year 5$103.7M+$24.5M$128.2M27.6%
$895.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.41B
Exit EV (11x)
$515.6M
Value Created
$128.2M
Exit EBITDA
$142.5M
Organic Growth
$244.8M
RCM Value Creation
$128.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.7M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$149K$223K$298K$357K
Total$12.2M$18.4M$24.5M$29.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.2%-7.9%4.8%14.7%
P82
Net-to-Gross11.9%12.7%18.1%25.0%
P21
Occupancy79.5%57.7%68.4%77.6%
P81
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
P53
Exp/Bed$1.1M$895K$1.2M$1.6M
P41

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML