Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RIO GRANDE REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 450711 | TX | 295 beds | Current EBITDA $71.8M → Pro Forma $86.3M (+$14.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$275.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$71.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$86.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$14.5M
Modeled Uplift
$9.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.6M (vs $14.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$176K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.5M$5.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.3M$151K$5.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$845K$2.5M$3.4M$10.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$176K$176K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$88K$176K$176K$176K$176K$176K$176K
Cumulative$0$3.9M$7.9M$11.7M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M$14.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$71.8M$71.8M26.1%
Year 1$74.0M+$9.7M$83.6M30.4%
Year 2$76.2M+$14.5M$90.7M32.9%
Year 3$78.5M+$14.5M$93.0M33.8%
Year 4$80.8M+$14.5M$95.3M34.6%
Year 5$83.3M+$14.5M$97.7M35.5%
$718.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.08B
Exit EV (11x)
$357.0M
Value Created
$97.7M
Exit EBITDA
$114.4M
Organic Growth
$144.9M
RCM Value Creation
$97.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.0M
Clean Claim Rate$88K$132K$176K$211K
Total$7.2M$10.9M$14.5M$17.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 131 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.1%-7.3%4.9%15.1%
P92
Net-to-Gross9.7%12.7%18.1%25.2%
P8
Occupancy54.1%55.7%67.5%75.7%
P22
Rev/Bed$934K$784K$1.3M$1.5M
P29
Exp/Bed$690K$760K$1.1M$1.5M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML