Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LONGVIEW REGIONAL 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LONGVIEW REGIONAL
CCN 450702 | TX | 224 beds | Current EBITDA $26.7M → Pro Forma $42.0M (+$15.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$291.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$26.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$42.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$15.3M
Modeled Uplift
$10.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.6M (vs $15.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$186K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.8M$5.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$160K$5.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$894K$2.7M$3.5M$11.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$186K$186K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$93K$186K$186K$186K$186K$186K$186K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.3M$12.4M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x
9.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
10.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$26.7M$26.7M9.2%
Year 1$27.5M+$10.2M$37.7M12.9%
Year 2$28.3M+$15.3M$43.7M15.0%
Year 3$29.2M+$15.3M$44.5M15.3%
Year 4$30.1M+$15.3M$45.4M15.6%
Year 5$31.0M+$15.3M$46.3M15.9%
$267.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$509.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$242.1M
Value Created
$46.3M
Exit EBITDA
$42.5M
Organic Growth
$153.3M
RCM Value Creation
$46.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.5M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$93K$140K$186K$224K
Total$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$18.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 148 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.2%-7.8%4.9%13.7%
P56
Net-to-Gross10.4%13.6%19.0%28.1%
P10
Occupancy61.2%51.8%66.5%75.7%
P39
Rev/Bed$1.3M$632K$1.2M$1.5M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.2M$671K$1.1M$1.5M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML