Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN NORTHEAST 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HERMANN NORTHEAST
CCN 450684 | TX | 227 beds | Current EBITDA $20.4M → Pro Forma $40.5M (+$20.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$381.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$20.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$40.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$20.1M
Modeled Uplift
$15.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $15.1M (vs $20.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$244K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.6M$7.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.3M$210K$7.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.6M$14.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$244K$244K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$122K$244K$244K$244K$244K$244K$244K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$10.9M$16.3M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M$20.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.4x70% / 14.2x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.6x
9.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x
10.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
11.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
12.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
34%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 34% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$20.4M$20.4M5.4%
Year 1$21.0M+$13.4M$34.4M9.0%
Year 2$21.6M+$20.1M$41.7M10.9%
Year 3$22.3M+$20.1M$42.3M11.1%
Year 4$23.0M+$20.1M$43.0M11.3%
Year 5$23.7M+$20.1M$43.7M11.5%
$204.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$480.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$276.7M
Value Created
$43.7M
Exit EBITDA
$32.5M
Organic Growth
$200.5M
RCM Value Creation
$43.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.5M$9.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$122K$183K$244K$293K
Total$10.0M$15.0M$20.1M$24.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 148 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.4%-8.0%4.9%13.7%
P51
Net-to-Gross20.4%13.7%19.0%28.1%
P53
Occupancy91.7%51.8%66.5%75.7%
P95
Rev/Bed$1.7M$632K$1.2M$1.5M
P82
Exp/Bed$1.6M$671K$1.1M$1.5M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML