Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA HOUSTON HEALTHCARE TOMBALL 2026-04-26 12:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA HOUSTON HEALTHCARE TOMBALL
CCN 450670 | TX | 205 beds | Current EBITDA $5.1M → Pro Forma $16.4M (+$11.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$214.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$11.3M
Modeled Uplift
$7.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.7M
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.6M (vs $11.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$138K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.3M$4.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.1M$118K$4.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$659K$2.0M$2.6M$8.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$138K$138K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$871K$1.7M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$69K$138K$138K$138K$138K$138K$138K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.2M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.3x93% / 27.1x95% / 28.4x97% / 29.8x
9.0x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.2x88% / 23.7x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.1x
10.0x75% / 16.6x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.0x86% / 22.1x88% / 23.2x
11.0x71% / 14.8x76% / 16.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x83% / 20.8x
12.0x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.1x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.9x80% / 18.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.9x
Headroom (turns)
60%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 60% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.6x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.1M$5.1M2.4%
Year 1$5.2M+$7.5M$12.8M5.9%
Year 2$5.4M+$11.3M$16.7M7.8%
Year 3$5.5M+$11.3M$16.8M7.8%
Year 4$5.7M+$11.3M$17.0M7.9%
Year 5$5.9M+$11.3M$17.2M8.0%
$50.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$188.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$138.3M
Value Created
$17.2M
Exit EBITDA
$8.1M
Organic Growth
$113.0M
RCM Value Creation
$17.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$69K$103K$138K$165K
Total$5.7M$8.5M$11.3M$13.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 149 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-6.9%4.8%13.3%
P45
Net-to-Gross9.8%13.5%18.9%28.1%
P7
Occupancy55.8%49.4%65.1%75.3%
P33
Rev/Bed$1.0M$608K$1.2M$1.5M
P42
Exp/Bed$1.0M$616K$1.0M$1.4M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML